Connect with us


I thought I saw a prison escapee on a train, so I called triple-0. Here’s what happened after

Related Story: 'It's just a madhouse': Inside Victoria's prison system, where re..

Related Story: 'It's just a madhouse': Inside Victoria's prison system, where rehabilitation is failing Related Story: 'A sausage factory': What do magistrates' soaring caseloads mean for justice?

The man was picking at the sores on his face and using the blood on his finger to write on the wall of the train. So it was no surprise he had a bank of seats to himself.

He appeared to be in his early twenties, and agitated.

Normally I'd look the other way, hoping that both our journeys would end without incident.

But there was something else that looked strange — an olive green tracksuit with "PPP" on the left breast.

I remember the shock when it dawned on me what those letters stood for.

Port Phillip Prison.

By now, he had noticed my attention, and as the train pulled into the next station, he got up and fled.

I called triple-0 to report a possible escaped prisoner, and sent through the photos I had snapped on my phone.

A colleague in the ABC's newsroom also put in a media enquiry, but shortly afterwards, Corrections Victoria called back and said there were no reports of escapees.

The truth, which I learned weeks later, was perhaps even more surprising.

The "prisoner" was probably a former inmate who had been released in his uniform.

I remember thinking such a notion was absurd — the sight of a man in prison greens on public transport could easily startle someone.

But I discovered that it does happen — and more often than Corrections Victoria would like.

A sign reads 'PRISON PROPERTY KEEP OUT' in front of walls surrounding Port Phillip Prison.

"It's a stigmatising piece of clothing," said Claire Seppings, a social worker who has developed programs to reduce prisoner reoffending.

"It sends up all signs of judgements and fears when people see that."

While it's not common practice for inmates to be released in uniform, it happens frequently enough to cause concern.

"The first few days [after release] are crucial," Ms Seppings said.

"It's often when they're at the highest risk of relapse or further offending."

'Is anyone down on their muster?'

I lodged a Freedom of Information request for internal Corrections Victoria emails about the incident on the train, and discovered they went as high as the department's then-acting commissioner, Rod Wise.

The morning after I called triple-0, he sent an email to prison managers asking:

"Did we send anyone to court yesterday in greens, folks? Alternatively, is anyone one down on their muster?"

In other words: is anyone missing a prisoner?

A reply from the Melbourne Assessment Prison confirmed that prisoners were being discharged in their prison uniforms — and that every day, a couple of prisoners were being sent to court in them as well.

It offered this reason:

"Reception staff tell me more and more [prisoners are] coming in with nothing but the dirty clothes on their back which are often discarded.

"They either have no clothes or refuse to use the limited Salvo stock."

Stairs lead to an upper level of a high-security prison unit.

Mr Wise responded shortly after:

"I would be really keen for prisoners not to attend in greens."

He suggested alternative clothing "of an equivalent value" could be provided.

Little more than an hour later, deputy commissioner Brendan Money sent an email to multiple prison managers suggesting new tracksuits could be ordered to provide to prisoners before release.

"An ABC journalist contacted us with a photo of a man with a mohawk on a train — and he was wearing what appeared to be prison greens and prison shoes.

"There is an increasing number of prisoners being sent to court in prison greens or discharged in greens.

"The preference is that this does not happen."

Barwon Prison management said it was interested in a "small supply" of different coloured tracksuits, but "only where there is legitimate need".

An email from Metropolitan Remand Centre warned that releasing prisoners in new tracksuits "could be quite costly".

Ultimately, it was decided the best plan of action was to order new grey tracksuits and polo shirts for the prisoners.

External Link: Documents released under FOI relating to the release of prisoners

Prisoner 'kicked out' barefoot

There are a range of reasons a prisoner might find they are suddenly released by a court while still in their prison uniform.

In such cases, they may be able to access a charity who can offer clothing, and perhaps a short stay in crisis accommodation.

Craig Camblin walked out of prison barefoot, after leaving his shoes behind for another prisoner.

Each time he walked out of jail, having done another stretch for armed robbery to feed his heroin habit, he tried to go straight, but couldn't, he said.

"I got pretty much kicked out with a bag in my hand and a cheque for $200," he said.

Craig Camblin sits on stairs outside a derelict building.

"I didn't have anywhere to stay. I asked them over and over and over to convert my cheque to cash so I can pay for accommodation and they still wouldn't do it.

"I rang up a friend of mine, but I knew from the past I couldn't stay with him for more than a couple of days.

"I ended up living with a bloke that I knew was a drug dealer, which didn't turn out too well."

Corrections Victoria said prisoners were paid with cheques to encourage "thoughtful spending", as cheques cannot be "used immediately for items such as drugs and alcohol".

Inmates that are considered to have "high transitional needs" can also take part in support programs before or after release.

A revolving gate, below a sign labelled 'ENTRY', out the front of a prison yard.

Slipping through the cracks

Victoria spends more per prisoner than any other state, but the rate of recidivism is 44 per cent.

The problem, according to Ms Seppings, is that many former prisoners slip through the cracks.

"Once a person has completed their sentence, and if they're not under continuing supervision for community corrections, there is no further remit for corrections," Ms Seppings said.

"So it really is a community responsibility."

She said releasing inmates in prison uniforms was just the tip of the iceberg of problems former prisoners faced.

Ms Seppings is now helping to set up a mentoring program with Marngoneet Correctional Centre, near Geelong, which will connect newly released prisoners with former inmates.

"The majority of people in prison are going to return to the community," Ms Seppings said.

"It's in the community's best interest … and a person's best interest to be able to come back into the community as the best person that they [can] possibly be.

"That's where you reduce crime, reduce further victims."

Tracksuits instead of greens

Less than 24 hours after the ABC's initial media enquiry about the man on the train, prisons were being encouraged to place an order of grey tracksuits.

Matters of State

Why are Victoria's prisons failing?

Victoria is locking up more people than ever before, resulting in one of the most expensive prison systems in Australia. Is it making Victoria safe?

But a month later, a photo of another prisoner wearing an olive green PPP tracksuit at Bendigo County Court appeared in a local newspaper, prompting another concerned email from Corrections Victoria.

The department offered Port Phillip Prison priority order of grey tracksuits, given its "sizeable remand population".

In response to a series of questions, a Corrections Victoria spokeswoman said prisoners being released in their greens was a "longstanding issue", as donated clothing was sometimes unsuitable or refused.

"Corrections Victoria's Prison Industries program has now started making grey tracksuits for use as a last resort where prisoners have no other clothing alternative," a statement said.

"The alternative clothing is also made available to the operators of Victoria's private prisons."

The department would not say why it did not force prisons to provide alternative clothing.

"Corrections Victoria has also reminded prisons about the importance of prisoners not attending court or being released in prison greens," the statement said.

It said regular headcounts ensured Victorian prisons were secure.

Continue Reading


China deploys anti-ship missiles in the desert making them harder to intercept

Beijing has announced it has deployed intermediate ballistic missiles to the country's north-we..

Beijing has announced it has deployed intermediate ballistic missiles to the country's north-west region, saying the weapons have the capacity to destroy US ships entering disputed waters in the South China Sea.

Key points:

  • The missiles can fire long distances and would be difficult for US ships to shoot down
  • Defence strategy expert Dr Malcom Davis said the move means China can back up its threats
  • The news came after a US guided missile destroyer passed through the South China Sea

The DF-26 missiles — which have been previously dubbed the 'Guam Killer' or 'Guam Express' by Chinese media and defence experts — are capable of carrying conventional or nuclear warheads.

They have a range of 4,500 kilometres, making them capable of reaching as far as Guam in the east and Indonesia in the south, providing Beijing with a powerful weapon as tensions continue to rise in the South China Sea.

External Link: @globaltimesnews: China's df-26 missiles

According to Chinese state media publication The Global Times, the DF-26 missiles are now stationed in north-west China's sparse plateau and desert areas, carried on the backs of trucks able to traverse the harsh terrain.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, a Beijing-based military expert told the Times that positioning the missiles deep in China's mainland made them more difficult to intercept as it allowed the missile to enter its final stages at a high speed.

Footage on CCTV showed trucks carrying the missiles driving through rough terrain and sand dunes.

The missiles were first paraded in 2015 and China confirmed they were now operational in April last year, but this is the first footage of the missiles outside of a parade.

It is unclear when the missiles were moved to the northwest region, the Times reported. (more…)

Continue Reading


Melbourne driver who cheated death when sign fell on car in no rush to drive again

Related Story: Dashcam footage shows moment car was crushed by falling freeway sign

The Melbourne ..

Related Story: Dashcam footage shows moment car was crushed by falling freeway sign

The Melbourne driver who cheated death when an overhead road sign fell and crushed her car says she cannot believe such an accident could happen in Australia.

Key points:

  • A second sign on the Tullamarine Freeway has been taken down as a precautionary measure
  • An inspection of similar-sized sign and gantries is underway
  • VicRoads says an independent investigator has been brought in to determine what happened

Extraordinary dashcam footage shows the moment the five-by-four metre sign fell in front of, and then on top of, Nella Lettieri's car as she was travelling on Melbourne's Tullamarine Freeway earlier this week.

While the 53-year-old was not seriously injured, she is bruised and battered — and wondering how she is still alive.

"It felt like a roller door had slammed shut in front of me," Ms Lettieri said.

"I've gone to swerve, but as I swerved, it just felt like the sign was actually falling on the car.

"And it just kept bouncing, and I felt like it was pushing me to the right, and I'm thinking, 'OK, is it going to stop?'"

A woman smiling and looking off camera.

She thought the metal object may have been from a plane landing or taking off from the nearby Essendon Airport, or from a truck on the freeway.

But she was shocked to discover it was actually an overhead sign, meant to be directing drivers to their destination. (more…)

Continue Reading


In his Brexit speech in Wakefield, Jeremy Corbyn again demanded the impossible

Speaking in Wakefield this morning, Jeremy Corbyn restated his demand for a solution to the Brexit i..

Speaking in Wakefield this morning, Jeremy Corbyn restated his demand for a solution to the Brexit impasse that appears effectively impossible: a general election.

In what is likely to be his last major public statement before MPs vote on the withdrawal agreement next Tuesday, he attempted to redefine the terms of the question facing both the Labour leadership and its MPs – from those that threaten to stretch his fissiparous electoral coalition to breaking point, to those which, on paper, unite it.

That resulted in a speech whose thrust was an appeal to class consciousness from Remainers in Tottenham and Leavers in Mansfield, rather than any meaningful debate over the validity or viability of Brexit itself. “Youre up against it,” Corbyn said, citing austerity, stagnant wages, and the cost of living crisis, “but youre not against each other.”

Accordingly, his cursory repetition of Labours policy – that a second referendum should remain on the table as an option in the event a general election does not happen – came with a caveat so huge that it amounted to an implicit dismissal of a so-called peoples vote. “Any political leader who wants to bring the country together cannot wish away the votes of 17 million people who wanted to leave, any more than they can ignore the concerns of the 16 million who voted to remain.”

But despite the fact that his attention was more or less exclusively focussed on the question of what sort of future relationship with Europe would negotiate – with the fact of the divorce undisputed – Corbyn categorically ruled out doing anything but whipping his MPs to vote against the withdrawal agreement. The vast majority of them will do so on Thursday, after which point Corbyn said, as expected, that Labour would table a motion of no confidence in the hope of securing an election and with it the chance to renegotiate Brexit (rather than, say, holding a second referendum).

Notably, however, he did not specify a timescale for tabling a confidence vote after Mays deal falls – despite several of his shadow cabinet ministers insisting that he would do so “immediately”. He instead put on the record the more cautious line briefed by his team yesterday: “Labour will table a motion of no confidence in the government at the moment we judge it to have the best chance of success.”

That statement of intent was followed with a caveat seldom offered by shadow cabinet ministers sent out to spin the partys line on Brexit. “Clearly,” Corbyn said, “Labour does not have enough MPs in parliament to win a confidence vote on its own.” As he himself alluded to when he urged opposition MPs to join Labour in voting against the government, Labours chances remain slim until such time that the ten DUP MPs drop the government. (That every other party will is a racing certainty.) Paradoxically, the defeat of the withdrawal agreement – and with it the backstop Mays sometime coalition partners object to – will make that chance even slimmer.

We know from what Corbyn said this morning that the Labour leadership will not whip its MPs to approve Theresa Mays Brexit, back a second referendum out of choice – both courses threaten its electoral base in different ways – or support any attempt by Downing Street to make the Brexit deal more amenable to Labour MPs by tacking on guarantees on workers rights. That strategy has held until now.

But failure to roll the pitch for any alternative at all – or, indeed, for the inevitable breakdown in party discipline after Mays vote is defeated and Labour has no way to bind MPs who seek mutually exclusive Brexit aims – will make the messy politics of the aftermath of next Tuesday rather more difficult to finesse.

Patrick Maguire is the New Statesman's political correspondent. (more…)

Continue Reading