Connect with us


The Last Jedi broke Star Wars, for better and for worse

BB-8 and Poe Dameron (Disney/Lucas Films)
It almost goes without saying, but spoilers ahead.

To cal..

The Last Jedi broke Star Wars, for better and for worse.
BB-8 and Poe Dameron (Disney/Lucas Films)

It almost goes without saying, but spoilers ahead.

To call Episode VIII a decisive film may soon become an understatement, with nearly every aspect receiving equal amounts of praise and scorn from fans and critics alike. One thing that can be agreed on however, is that the film took the series in a new direction, actively repelling what the series represents to many.

If you ever take a class in story writing most likely within the first lesson you’ll be looking at a PowerPoint slide titled “The Hero’s Journey” next to a Star Wars poster. Since the concept’s popularisation from friend of Lucas, Joseph Campbell, the two have been near inseparable.

The young nobody with a mysterious heritage and a natural ability faces a seemingly unbeatable foe – they rise, fall to their lowest, only to rise again triumphant. The Force Awakens retraced these points to a tee, delighting in its heritage and nostalgia to the point where many deemed it more a remake than a sequel.

Rey and Luke, The Last Jedi
Rey and Luke (Disney/Lucas Films)

The Last Jedi actively takes the opposite approach. It no longer creates parallels between its counterpart film, but mocks them. A snowy planet showdown isn’t at the start of the film it’s at the end, and it’s not even snow! The tree reminiscent of the cave where Luke fights himself in training isn’t a place of darkness, but a place of light. There’s a sunken X-Wing, begging to be lifted out of the water, but when Luke does return it’s revealed he never even left the planet. These small moments are when the film seems to be looking at The Force Awakens and holding it’s hands up, acknowledging it’s predecessors faults with harmless changes.

Then come the deeper cuts. Every single question, theory, and point of interest from The Force Awakens has been answered or deemed unimportant, thrown aside like the lightsabre handed to Luke.

Kylo’s helmet, the most iconic part of his character is destroyed within his first scene.

Rey’s lineage results in nothing, leaving the great mystery of her life a disappointment… but most importantly their rivalry is almost all but resolved by these things, before being ignited once more of course. Star Wars boldly destroyed any hints at lore or mysteries to strengthen a meaningful bond in its characters moving forward, and it succeeds brilliantly.

Rey, The Last Jedi
Rey confronts her Dark Side
(Disney/Lucas Films)

It doesn’t just disregard its literal content, but it’s thematic elements as well. All Star Wars films have talked of balance to no end but none have presented it so thoroughly – there are no absolute evils, and there is no absolute good. In the past Luke has feared the dark side (an ideology whose ripples are shown to create the situation they’re in) but now Rey doesn’t hide from it, she embraces it, and upon realising it doesn’t offer her what she desires most, decides she doesn’t need it.

While Rey makes peace with the dark side Kylo turns on it, realising both sides have offered him nothing but pain and disappointment, as he vows to destroy their foundations. The Last Jedi taunts it’s predecessors’ simplistic moralities as Luke mocks his students – “Amazing, every word that you just said was wrong”.

That’s not to say that there is nothing lost in this pursuing of difference.

The lack of a major time gap between the two films doesn’t so much create a greater sense of continuing story, as it does shrink down the imagined scale of the galactic wide war.

By trying to avoid the expected there’s no death scene for Leia, despite having a clear opportunity to do so while continuing to build on its characters without re-treading The Force Awakens. Resolutions to smaller conflicts such as Captain Phasma feel rushed and forced, aiding the films destructive ideals, but also bogging it down.

Classic characters are killed off-screen to allow new characters to briefly hold the spotlight, only to die as well. Although the classic characters for those parts may, admittedly, not be as developed as those newly introduced the disregard for people’s affection for them feels more like a misstep then meaningful blow.

Finn and Captain Phasma, The Last Jedi
Finn and Captain Phasma’s final duel (Disney/Lucas Films)

If The Force Awakens was a puzzle set, trying to depict A New Hope down to every detail, then The Last Jedi scrambles its pieces, trying to make a mosaic. Sure it’s different, and sometimes it really works, but in the end it’s still the same pieces, and that’s almost the trouble.

The multiple storylines of Empire return, but seem out of place, cutting back and forth between a small character drama, action romp, and slow burning coup at a pace akin to sitting centre court at a pro tennis match. Neither storyline really gets the time to develop or sink in for a majority of the film as it’s too worried you’ll stop caring for something else by slowing down.

But where The Last Jedi really makes its mark is by changing the film it’s reflecting entirely. The throne room centrepiece of the film all too obviously plays out like the finale to Return of the Jedi, with the all powerful evil force showing the hero their friends imminent demise, only for the hero to team up with said baddies right hand man and take him down once and for all…

Then it continues.

More: Film

With Return of the Jedi that was it, they won, happy ending, roll credits. Here it’s not only the middle of the trilogy but it’s nearly the middle of the film. It’s decimated the story structure that Star Wars itself helped to popularise, sliced in two like its aptly killed villain.

The Last Jedi has forcible torn itself free of everything, and while it was by no means clean it does what it intended. Past, present, and (until now) predestined future have been struck, and the series can go anywhere it wants now.

The Last Jedi treats it’s heritage like the Luke’ Jedi texts, something to be burned as nothing more can be learned from them. It’s Kylo’s parents, something holding him back from his true potential, and it’s Rey’s parents, something that could never be lived up to and at the same time was never really anything at all.

The Force Awakens fed into people’s expectations, The Last Jedi has dashed them. Now it’s time to see if it can rise again, to see if this new trilogy can earn it’s own legacy.

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

MORE: Star Wars Easter Egg: Mark Hamill confirms second secret role in The Last Jedi

Original Article

The post The Last Jedi broke Star Wars, for better and for worse appeared first on News Wire Now.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


‘Antebellum’ has a ‘Get Out’ vibe, but doesn’t live up to its twist

“Antebellum” is built around a provocative twist, and it’s a good one — as well as one that definite..

“Antebellum” is built around a provocative twist, and it’s a good one — as well as one that definitely shouldn’t be spoiled even a little. Once that revelation is absorbed, however, the movie becomes less distinctive and inspired, reflecting an attempt to tap into the zeitgeist that made “Get Out” a breakthrough, without the same ability to pay off the premise.

Originally destined for a theatrical run, the movie hits digital platforms trumpeting a “Get Out” pedigree in its marketing campaign, since there’s an overlap among the producing teams.

More directly, the film marks the directing debut of Gerard Bush + Christopher Renz, who have championed social-justice issues through their advertising work. The opening script features a quote from author William Faulkner, whose intent will eventually become clearer: “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”

If that sounds like a timely means of drawing a line from the horrors of slavery to the racism of today, you’ve come to the right place.

The story begins on a plantation, where the brutal overseers carry out grisly punishments against those tilling the fields. A few have just tried to escape, led by Veronica (Janelle Monae), and they pay a heavy price for their resistance, which does nothing to curb her defiance.

Also written by Bush + Renz, the script take too long before revealing what makes “Antebellum” different, but the middle portion — a “The Twilight Zone”-like phase when it’s hard to be sure exactly what’s going on — is actually the film’s strongest. (Even the trailer arguably gives away too much, so the less one knows, the better.)

The final stretch, by contrast, veers into more familiar thriller territory, and feels especially rushed toward the end, leaving behind a host of nagging, unanswered questions. That provides food for thought, but it’s also what separates the movie from something like “Get Out,” which deftly fleshed out its horror underpinnings.

Although the filmmakers (in a taped message) expressed disappointment that the movie wasn’t making its debut in theaters, in a strange way, the on-demand format somewhat works in its favor. In the press notes, Bush says the goal was “to force the audience to look at the real-life horror of racism through the lens of film horror. We’re landing in the middle of the very conversations that we hoped ‘Antebellum’ would spur.”

“Antebellum” should add to that discussion, so mission accomplished on that level. Monae is also quite good in her first leading film role (she did previously star in the series “Homecoming’s” second season), but otherwise, most of the characters remain underdeveloped.

In a theater, the tendency with a movie so dependent on a central mystery might be to become antsy. At home, “Antebellum” is worth seeing, not only because of what it has to say about America’s past and present, but as a reminder of the often yawning gap between an intriguing idea and a fully realized film.

Read from source:

Share this:

Continue Reading


‘Chemical Hearts’ director Richard Tanne on the film’s ‘bittersweet’ ending and what he hopes fans take away from the movie

“Chemical Hearts” director Richard Tanne spoke to Insider about the film’s “bittersweet” ending and ..

“Chemical Hearts” director Richard Tanne spoke to Insider about the film’s “bittersweet” ending and what he hopes fans take away from it.

“I think it’s gonna disappoint some people, and maybe all people on a certain level, ” the 35-year-old filmmaker told us. “It’s bittersweet. But that’s OK.”

The film, based on Krystal Sutherland’s 2016 book “Our Chemical Hearts” and now available to stream on Amazon Prime Video, centers on 17-year-old high school senior Henry Page (Austin Abrams), who finds himself drawn to a mysterious and secretive new transfer student named Grace Town (Lili Reinhart).

“Chemical Hearts” is told from Henry’s perspective, chronicling his first heartbreak after he falls in love with the person he thinks Grace is.

Tanne, who wrote the screenplay, said that he was impressed by how the story goes ‘a little bit deeper than your average teen romance’

“I loved how it embraced the dark side of being young, the pain and the grief and the loss, the idea of crossing the threshold from being an adolescent to an adult for the first time,” he told us.

By the end of the movie, Henry learns about Grace’s tragic past. On their last day of senior year, the characters don’t end up together. Instead, they prepare to explore different futures, with Henry heading off to a school for writing and Grace taking a year off to continue therapy.

Even though fans might be disappointed by the love interests splitting, Tanne said that ‘not everything has to be escapist’

“Sometimes, younger people watching movies don’t know that it’s OK to have unhappy endings because they’re fed a steady stream, a steady diet of escapist happily ever after movies,” he told us. “And that’s OK.”

He added: “There’s a place for those, I’m not knocking them. But I just wanted to make something that didn’t talk down to the younger audience. I wanted to make something that either meets them at their level or asks them to reach a little bit higher or dig a little bit deeper.”

Tanne said that having to confront that ‘bittersweet ending’ could also be useful to viewers

The director described the conclusion as bittersweet because “there’s hope at the end, maybe not for their relationship, but for other aspects of their lives.”

“Maybe it will be helpful for young people to see that and walk away with the same sting that Henry has, but to know that it’s going to be OK, to know that Henry will be OK,” he said.

Abrams, who was 22 when he filmed the movie, told Insider that hopefully, audiences will empathize with Henry.

“I think in terms of I supposed how he’s navigating relationships, I feel like hopefully at least anyone can relate to that,” he said.

Abrams told Insider that Henry and Grace’s relationship status at the end speaks to the film’s realistic nature

Abrams shared similar sentiments as Tanne, telling us that they tried to “portray the characters as honestly as possible,” which ties in to the conclusion.

“I think there are some people that meet one person and that’s who they’re with for the rest of their lives, who actually are Henry’s parents in the movie,” the 23-year-old actor told us.

“But then there are other people, and I think it’s probably a larger number, that are going to be in multiple relationships and some of them, a lot of them aren’t going to go well. I hope that that’s an aspect of the movie that people are able to relate to.”

Abrams added that he’s “perfectly fine” letting fans decide for themselves what their main takeaways are from “Chemical Hearts.”

“I hope that maybe they take away things that I didn’t even think of, because everyone’s different and at a different point in their life and hopefully will be able to relate to it in different ways.”

Read from source:

Continue Reading


Julia Sawalha furious after being told she is ‘too old’

Julia Sawalha has said she has been “plucked, stuffed and roasted” after being told that she would n..

Julia Sawalha has said she has been “plucked, stuffed and roasted” after being told that she would not be cast in the forthcoming sequel to the hit Aardman Animation film Chicken Run as her voice sounded “too old”.

In the original film, released in 2000, Sawalha voiced the lead role of Ginger, the plucky hen who inspires her fellow egg-layers to escape from a farm when they are threatened with being turned into pies. News of the development of a sequel first emerged in 2018, and Netflixs involvement was announced in June. It is due to be directed by Sam Fell (ParaNorman) and start production in 2021.

Sawalha posted a statement on social media saying she was told a week ago that she was not wanted for the sequel. “The reason they gave is that my voice now sounds too old and they want a younger actress to reprise the role.”

She added: “Usually in these circumstances, an actress would be given the chance to do a voice test in order to determine the suitability of their pitch and tone, I however was not given this opportunity. I am passionate about my work and I dont go down without a fight, so I did my own voice test at home and sent it to the producers … However, they stated, We will be going ahead to recast the voice of Ginger.”

Sawalhas protest follows reports that Mel Gibson, who voiced the character of daredevil rooster Rocky, would not be involved in the sequel. While Rocky is named as a character in the official plot synopsis for Chicken Run 2, the role is due to be recast. Variety magazine reported that Gibson was told that as “the sequel will revolve around younger chickens, therefore casting younger voice actors” was necessary. The report also claimed that Gibsons history of controversial behaviour, including an accusation of antisemitic comments by actor Winona Ryder, which Gibson denies, played no part in the recasting.

Sawalha added: “I feel I have been fobbed off with the same excuse … To say I am devastated and furious would be an understatement. I feel totally powerless.”

No official announcements have been made for the Chicken Run 2 cast, but original film cast members Jane Horrocks and Lynn Ferguson have been added to the films IMDb page.

Aardman has been contacted for a response.


Continue Reading