Connect with us

Australia

Eva Longoria and Jose Baston are expecting first child

A rep for the 42-year-old actress confirmed the news
Eva and the 49-year-old media mogul are expect..

  • A rep for the 42-year-old actress confirmed the news
  • Eva and the 49-year-old media mogul are expecting a baby boy
  • It will be the Desperate Housewives alum's first child
  • Baston already shares three kids with ex-wife Natalia Esperón
  • A source said Eva 'kept touching her stomach' at L'Oreal event earlier this month
  • Eva and José tied the knot in May 2016

By Justin Enriquez For Dailymail.com

Published: 18:02 EST, 19 December 2017 | Updated: 19:04 EST, 19 December 2017

Eva Longoria and José 'Pepe' Baston are expecting their first child together.

The 42-year-old actress is four months pregnant with the 49-year-old media mogul's child a rep confirmed to Us Weekly on Tuesday.

That wasn't all the happy news as the insider told the publication that the happy couple are expecting a bouncing baby boy.

Happy news: Eva Longoria and Jose 'Pepe' Baston are expecting their first child together according to an Us Weekly report on Tuesday

Happy news: Eva Longoria and Jose 'Pepe' Baston are expecting their first child together according to an Us Weekly report on Tuesday

Baston already shares three kids – 22-year-old daughter Natalia and 14-year-old twins Mariana and Jose – with ex-wife Natalia Esperón.

Unfortunately their son Sebastian tragically died days after birth in 2003.

Eva may have been hinting at her happy news just weeks ago at the L'Oreal Paris 12th Annual Women Of Worth Event on December 6.

Clue? Eva may have been hinting at her happy news just weeks ago at the L'Oreal Paris 12th Annual Women Of Worth Event on December 6 as an insider for Us Weekly said she 'kept touching her stomach'Clue? Eva may have been hinting at her happy news just weeks ago at the L'Oreal Paris 12th Annual Women Of Worth Event on December 6 as an insider for Us Weekly said she 'kept touching her stomach'

Clue? Eva may have been hinting at her happy news just weeks ago at the L'Oreal Paris 12th Annual Women Of Worth Event on December 6 as an insider for Us Weekly said she 'kept touching her stomach'

An insider told Us Weekly at the time that the former star of Desperate Housewives 'kept touching her stomach' while posing for photos.

Eva last showed off her fantastic bikini body during a loved up trip to Ibiza, Spain in late July.

The lovebirds could barely keep their lips off one another as they smooched on the beach.

Two years ago in the summer of 2015, Eva questioned if it was too late for her to have children after announcing her engagement.

'I just turned 40, so I have thought, "Is time running out?" Longoria told People at the time. 'I should be thinking about [children], but I feel like my life is full.'

Wow factor: Eva last showed off her fantastic bikini body during a loved up trip to Ibiza, Spain in late JulyWow factor: Eva last showed off her fantastic bikini body during a loved up trip to Ibiza, Spain in late July

Wow factor: Eva last showed off her fantastic bikini body during a loved up trip to Ibiza, Spain in late July

Passion: The lovebirds could barely keep their lips off one another as they smooched on the beachPassion: The lovebirds could barely keep their lips off one another as they smooched on the beach

Passion: The lovebirds could barely keep their lips off one another as they smooched on the beach

The two began dating in 2013 and were engaged two years later in Dubai.

Eva and José tied the knot in Mexico back in May 2016, despite the star previously claiming to People magazine that she didn't think she would marry again.

Former flame: Eva married NBA player Tony Parker in 2007 as they are pictured in FranceFormer flame: Eva married NBA player Tony Parker in 2007 as they are pictured in France

Former flame: Eva married NBA player Tony Parker in 2007 as they are pictured in France

'I'm not a fan of marriage; but I like being married to him,' she said. 'I never thought I would get married again. It's him, he makes it all worth it.'

No doubt the president of Televisa changed all of that for Eva as she gushed about him and even called him 'soulmate' in an interview with Ocean Drive in October 2016.

'Pepe and I are soulmates — I don't even know how to explain it, because it's like we're two different sides of the same coin,' she explained. 'He's compassionate, kind, handsome — he's everything I wanted and didn't even know I wanted.'

Eva has tied the knot before Baston as the star first married Tyler Christopher in 2002, before splitting two years later and wed ex-husband basketball player Tony Parker in 2007.

She said in the same interview that she believes in their relationships and doesn't regret her past marriages.

'I think every relationship is a path to where you are today,' Eva said. 'Every wrong turn led you to the spot where you are, so it wasn't necessarily the wrong turn at the time. I wouldn't change anything — never.'

'Pepe and I are soulmates': Eva gushed about the president of Televisa in an interview with Ocean Drive in October of last year, as they are pictured together back in August'Pepe and I are soulmates': Eva gushed about the president of Televisa in an interview with Ocean Drive in October of last year, as they are pictured together back in August

'Pepe and I are soulmates': Eva gushed about the president of Televisa in an interview with Ocean Drive in October of last year, as they are pictured together back in August

Stunning: Eva looked absolutely gorgeous at the 8th Annual Bombay Sapphire Artisan Series Finale in Miami a week and a half agoStunning: Eva looked absolutely gorgeous at the 8th Annual Bombay Sapphire Artisan Series Finale in Miami a week and a half ago

Stunning: Eva looked absolutely gorgeous at the 8th Annual Bombay Sapphire Artisan Series Finale in Miami a week and a half ago

Original Article

The post Eva Longoria and Jose Baston are expecting first child appeared first on News Wire Now.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Australia

Saudi women in Sydney: Sisters’ bodies lay undiscovered for a month

Australian police are baffled after the bodies of two Saudi women, believed to have lain undiscovered for a month, were found in a Sydney apartment.

Sisters Asra Abdullah Alsehli, 24, and Amaal Abdullah Alsehli, 23, were found dead on 7 June in separate beds at home in the suburb of Canterbury.

Police, who were called to the property for a welfare check, said the women are believed to have died in early May.

But despite “extensive inquiries”, they still do not know how or why.

The sisters moved to Australia from Saudi Arabia in 2017 and may have sought asylum, The Sydney Morning Herald reported. Police refused to confirm this, saying they do not comment on residential status.

A human rights organisation said it should be established whether the women fled Saudi Arabia because of domestic violence or harsh laws governing women. However, there is no evidence this is the case.

Police said they had been in contact with the women’s family, which is assisting them with inquiries.

Lina al-Hathloul, head of monitoring and communications at Saudi human rights organisation ALQST, said it “would not be the first case” of Saudi women who were killed abroad after fleeing domestic violence.

“There are no protections for women who are victims of domestic violence in Saudi Arabia, so they flee abroad,” she told the BBC.

She added: “I’m not saying that is the case here, just that we need a thorough investigation. It is frustrating not to have any information.”

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, there had been signs that something was wrong.

Last year, the women told their building manager they thought someone was tampering with their food deliveries, the paper reported.

A plumber who visited the apartment also said he believed there was “something mysterious” going on, and that police had been called in the past over concerns for the women.

New South Wales Police issued a renewed plea to the public on Wednesday, saying “any piece of information” could be the key to solving this case.

The local community is close-knit, police said in a statement, asking anyone who may have known or seen the women to come forward.

A report from Australian current affairs programme Four Corners in 2019 found 80 Saudi women had tried to seek asylum in Australia in recent years. Many of them were fleeing male guardianship laws.

 

Read from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-62331116

Continue Reading

Australia

Australia election: Why is Australia’s parliament so white?

Australia is one of the most multicultural nations in the world, but it’s a different story in the country’s politics, where 96% of federal lawmakers are white.

With this year’s election, political parties did have a window to slightly improve this. But they chose not to in most cases, critics say.

Tu Le grew up the child of Vietnamese refugees in Fowler, a south-west Sydney electorate far from the city’s beaches, and one of the poorest urban areas in the country.

The 30-year-old works as a community lawyer for refugees and migrants newly arrived to the area.

Last year, she was pre-selected by the Labor Party to run in the nation’s most multicultural seat. But then party bosses side-lined her for a white woman.

It would take Kristina Kenneally four hours on public transport – ferry, train, bus, and another bus – to get to Fowler from her home in Sydney’s Northern Beaches, where she lived on an island.

Furious locals questioned what ties she had to the area, but as one of Labor’s most prominent politicians, she was granted the traditionally Labor-voting seat.

Ms Le only learned she’d been replaced on the night newspapers went to print with the story.

“I was conveniently left off the invitation to the party meeting the next day,” she told the BBC.

Despite backlash – including a Facebook group where locals campaigned to stop Ms Kenneally’s appointment – Labor pushed through the deal.

“If this scenario had played out in Britain or the United States, it would not be acceptable,” says Dr Tim Soutphomassane, director of the Sydney Policy Lab and Australia’s former Race Discrimination Commissioner.

“But in Australia, there is a sense that you can still maintain the status quo with very limited social and political consequences.”

An insiders’ game

At least one in five Australians have a non-European background and speak a language at home other than English, according to the last census in 2016.

Some 49% of the population was born or has a parent who was born overseas. In the past 20 years, migrants from Australia’s Asian neighbours have eclipsed those from the UK.

But the parliament looks almost as white as it did in the days of the “White Australia” policy – when from 1901 to the 1970s, the nation banned non-white immigrants.

“We simply do not see our multicultural character represented in anything remotely close to proportionate form in our political institutions,” says Dr Soutphomassane.

Compared to other Western multicultural democracies, Australia also lags far behind.

The numbers below include Indigenous Australians, who did not gain suffrage until the 1960s, and only saw their first lower house MP elected in 2010. Non-white candidates often acknowledge that any progress was first made by Aboriginal Australians.

Two decades ago, Australia and the UK had comparably low representation. But UK political parties – responding to campaigns from diverse members – pledged to act on the problem.

“The British Conservative Party is currently light years ahead of either of the major Australian political parties when it comes to race and representation,” says Dr Soutphomassane.

So why hasn’t Australia changed?

Observers say Australia’s political system is more closed-door than other democracies. Nearly all candidates chosen by the major parties tend to be members who’ve risen through the ranks. Often they’ve worked as staffers to existing MPs.

Ms Le said she’d have no way into the political class if she hadn’t been sponsored by Fowler’s retiring MP – a white, older male.

Labor has taken small structural steps recently – passing commitments in a state caucus last year, and selecting two Chinese-Australian candidates for winnable seats in Sydney.

But it was “one step forward and two steps back”, says party member and activist Osmond Chiu, when just weeks after the backlash to Ms Le’s case, Labor “parachuted in” another white candidate to a multicultural heartland.

Andrew Charlton, a former adviser to ex-PM Kevin Rudd, lived in a harbour mansion in Sydney’s east where he ran a consultancy.

His selection scuppered the anticipated races of at least three diverse candidates from the area which has large Indian and Chinese diasporas.

Party seniors argued that Ms Kenneally and Mr Charlton – as popular and respected party figures – would be able to promote their electorates’ concerns better than newcomers.

Labor leader Anthony Albanese also hailed Ms Kenneally as a “great Australian success story” as a migrant from the US herself.

But Mr Chiu says: “A lot of the frustration that people expressed wasn’t about these specific individuals.

“It was about the fact that these were two of the most multicultural seats in Australia and these opportunities – which come by so rarely – to select culturally diverse candidates were squandered.”

He adds this has long-term effects because the average MP stays in office for about 10 years.

The frustration on this issue has centred on Labor – because the centre-left party calls itself the “party of multiculturalism”.

But the Liberal-National government doesn’t even have diversity as a platform issue.

One of its MPs up for re-election recently appeared to confuse her Labor rival for Tu Le, sparking accusations that she’d mixed up the two Asian-Australian women – something she later denied. But as one opponent said: “How is this still happening in 2022?”

Some experts like Dr Soutphommasane have concluded that Australia’s complacency on areas like representation stems from how the nation embraced multiculturalism as official policy after its White Australia days.

The government of the 1970s, somewhat embarrassed by the past policy, passed racial discrimination laws and “a seat at the table” was granted to migrants and Indigenous Australians.

But critics say this has led to an Australia where multiculturalism is celebrated but racial inequality is not interrogated.

“Multiculturalism is almost apolitical in how it’s viewed in Australia,” Dr Soutphommasane says, in contrast to the “fight” for rights that other Western countries have seen from minority groups.

What is the impact?

A lack of representation in parliament can also lead to failures in policy.

During Sydney’s Covid outbreak in August 2021, Fowler and Parramatta electorates – where most of the city’s multicultural communities reside – were subject to harsher lockdowns as a result of a higher number of cases.

How will things change?

Liberal MP Dave Sharma, the only lawmaker of Indian heritage, has said all parties – including his own – should better recruit people with different backgrounds. He called it a “pretty laissez-faire attitude” currently.

Mr Albanese has urged Ms Le to “hang in there”, insisting she has a future.

But more people like Ms Le are choosing to speak out.

“I think I surprised a lot of people by not staying quiet,” she told the BBC.

“People acted like it was the end of my political career that I didn’t toe the party line. But… none of that means anything to me if it means I’m sacrificing my own values.”

She and other second-generation Australians – raised in a country which prides itself on “a fair go” – are agitating for the rights and access their migrant parents may not have felt entitled to.

“Many of those from diverse backgrounds were saying they felt like they didn’t have a voice – and that my case was a clear demonstration of their suppression, and their wider participation in our political system.”

She and others have noted the “growing distrust” in the major parties. Polls are predicting record voter support for independent candidates.

“This issue…. matters for everyone in Australian society that cares about democracy,” says Mr Soutphommasane.

“If democratic institutions are not representative, their legitimacy will suffer.

Read from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-61432762

Continue Reading

Australia

Scott Morrison effectively ditches his promise to establish a federal anti-corruption commission

Scott Morrison has effectively abandoned his promise to establish a federal anti-corruption watchdog, confirming he would only proceed with legislation in the new parliament if Labor agreed to pass the Coalition’s heavily criticised proposal without amendments.

Morrison pledged before the 2019 election to legislate a federal integrity body in the parliamentary term that has just ended. The prime minister broke that promise, failing to introduce his own proposal before the 46th parliament was prorogued.

On the hustings on Wednesday, Morrison was asked – given his previous undertaking to create the body – whether he would promise to put his proposal to a vote in the next parliament in the event the Coalition won the 21 May election.

Morrison declined to make that promise. “Our position on this hasn’t changed,” the prime minister said. “Our view has been the same – when the Labor party is prepared to support that legislation in that form, then we will proceed with it.”

The prime minister has attempted to inoculate himself from criticism about breaking an election promise by saying he tabled the integrity commission proposal in the parliament.

Tabling an exposure draft, which is what the prime minister did, is not the same as introducing finished legislation to the House of Representatives or the Senate that is then debated and voted on.

As well as repeatedly fudging what happened in parliament, Morrison has also created the impression the proposal can only proceed if Labor agrees to its passage without amendments.

All governments routinely introduce legislation for debate without any undertaking that it will be passed by the opposition. Labor favours a stronger model than the Coalition’s proposal.

Morrison’s lack of urgency on the issue created tensions within government ranks. Late last year, the Tasmanian Liberal MP Bridget Archer crossed the floor to support independent MP Helen Haines’ bill to establish a federal integrity commission. Archer accused the government of “inertia” over the issue.

At that time, Archer said she was “perplexed” at her own government’s failure to release a revised bill almost three years after it was promised before the last election.

While Morrison clearly wants to move on from the issue, he will face renewed pressure from crossbench independents if the coming election is close enough to deliver a hung parliament.

A number of independents running against Liberals in metropolitan seats have made it clear that establishing a credible national integrity commission will be a key demand in the event any new government – Liberal or Labor – is seeking agreements for confidence and supply.

Haines blasted Morrison’s comments on Wednesday. “Mr Morrison broke an election promise to introduce an anti-corruption commission and his pathway to creating one is still as vague as it was in the last parliament,” she said.

The crossbench independent said it was “nonsense” for the prime minister to claim that he could not proceed unless Labor agreed with the Coalition’s proposal without seeking any amendments. “It would appear we are in the same void as we were before,” Haines said.

Read from:https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/apr/13/scott-morrison-effectively-ditches-his-promise-to-establish-a-federal-anti-corruption-commission

Continue Reading

Trending