Connect with us

Films

How Jumanji Conquered Spider-Man To Become Sonys Highest-Grossing Film Ever At The U.S. Box Office

EXCLUSIVE: It finally happened.

Sonys Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle is officially the studios high..

EXCLUSIVE: It finally happened.

Sonys Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle is officially the studios highest-grossing film ever at the domestic box office, overtaking Sam Raimis Spider-Man ($403.7 million) which has owned the title for the past 16 years.

Heading into the holiday season, executives across distribution and film finance had a strong feeling that this reboot of Jumanji directed by Jake Kasdan would serve as strong counter-programming to Disneys Star Wars: The Last Jedi. The pic opened to $71.9 million over the six-day holiday and by the first weekend of January stole the No. 1 spot from the Rian Johnson sequel for four weekends out of its run.

But really, nobody was expecting a near billion-dollar global haul (No. 2 worldwide for Sony at $951M after Skyfalls $1.1 billion) nor a domestic take this high in the end. As Deadline already reported, our finance sources informed us that Jumanji will bring an estimated $305.7M in profit after all ancillaries back to Sony.

RelatedJumanji: Welcome To The Jungle Box Office Profits – 2017 Most Valuable Blockbuster Tournament

Stateside, Jumanji is already the highest-grossing film for Kasdan, and all of its stars too: Dwayne Johnson (beating his Fast and the Furious canon), Kevin Hart, Jack Black and Karen Gillan (besting her Guardians of the Galaxy pics). While many in the industry like to cry that the star system no longer works, heres a quintessential pairing of talent and material, with the skinny kid in the movie morphing into Johnson, the beautiful odd girl winding up as Black, and the muscular Jock turning into short wisenheimer Hart. More proof that the star system isnt entirely dead: With 300 million-plus followers on social media between Johnson and Hart, wherever they order their fans to go, theyre there, and they went to Jumanji.

Even more jaw-dropping is that in an age when Marvel superhero movies and Star Wars pics rule, here comes a dormant franchise originally inspired from Chris Van Allsburgs 1981 Caldecott-winning picture book and the 1995 Robin Williams TriStar movie, which completely takes off. If revisionist angles on dusty classics like King Arthur and Peter Pan cant pop at the box office, then why did this Jumanji reboot work?

Dwayne Johnson, left, Kevin Hart, Eniko Parrish and Tom Rothman at the premiere of “Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle”

“Its not the IP, its the I — the idea,” Sony Pictures Entertainment Group chairman Tom Rothman explains about the success of Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle. “Before the obsession grew with known properties only, big ideas are what powered big movies.”

At its center, Jumanji has a heartfelt story about teenagers at vulnerable points in their lives who turn into characters who are the opposite of their insecurities, a concept further heightened by Johnsons, Harts and Blacks comedic sensibilities.

“Thats a big, highly relatable idea across all demographics,” says Rothman.

Realize that for Jumanji to get to a near-$ billion worldwide, it couldnt depend on its 90s Williams brand at all. As we wrote in late December, the pics producer and former Columbia Pictures co-president Matt Tolmach got the idea of a Jumanji sequel to a place that no other administration could since the 1995 title opened. In fact, the late John Calley was musing about a Jumanji sequel when he took over as Sony Pictures Entertainment chairman 17 years ago.

For the current Sony brass, it was the pitch for a second Jumanji from Community TV series scribe Chris McKenna that did the trick.

“Chris had been a gamer growing up, and he would come back from school every day and escape into a video game as an avatar and be out of his life and body for a while. It was the power of that inspiration that became Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle, and its relevance is so much more important as gaming has evolved in this day and age,” Tolmach told us in December. When Rothman took over the reins of the studio, he met with several producers, and Tolmach came in prepared, having already polished McKennas idea about four high school kids who get sucked into a video game with different avatars and must overcome their shortcomings to get out.

Jake Kasdan, right, directs Dwayne Johnson.

“After my first meeting with Tom Rothman, he said Ill make that movie. I love that movie. There was always a lot of wind at our backs from everyone at Sony, and I felt inspired,” said Tolmach, who also reached out to Kasdan to direct.

Why was Kasdan the right guy? “Jake is brilliant and funny with an enormous heart. Watching these types of movies, which need to appeal to everybody, comedy is the entry point, especially when the conceit is this big,” explained Tolmach.

Bill Teitler, the original Jumanji producer, also worked with Tolmach. Radar Pictures was continually attached to a Jumanji sequel given how they were aboard the original and its follow-up Zathura. Erik Sommers, Scott Rosenberg and Jeff Pinkner also signed on to write. Deadline exclusively reported that Rosenberg and Pinkner are in talks to pen the Jumanji sequel.

Success in the theatrical business boils down to dating, and Jumanji was originally dated for July 28. But then Rothman had a Eureka moment while he was watching the early dailies: The movie reminded him a lot of another family adventure comedy he worked on at Fox, the $1.35 billion-grossing Night at the Museum series.

Jumanji looked like it was widely relatable with an appeal from 8 to 80,” says Rothman who, together with Sony distribution made the bold decision to move the feature into the Christmas corridor right after Disneys Star Wars: The Last Jedi.

Rothman calls the move at the time “controversial,” but “we felt early on from the dailies that the movie would be an all-audience event and at the end of the day that conviction really paid off.”

While Disney lorded over exhibition with strict terms for Last Jedi with a four-week wide commitment, a reported estimated 65% rental cut and an insistence that the sequel play in each multiplexs largest auditorium, Jumanji legged out as a wide release (1,000-plus theaters) for 14 weeks to Last Jedis eight — proof there are better terms for an exhibitor over the holiday season in which they can also reap some upside outside of popcorn.

Getting the word out on Jumanji was a 360-degree plan for Sony, not only showing off footage at CinemaCon but also leveraging the fans of co-star Nick Jonas, who debuted the “Jumanji Jumanji” Music Video on his social pages with further tubthumping during his iHeart Radio Jingle Ball concert appearances. Sony got clever with custom commercial vignettes on TV — read going after the Johnson jock crowd with an ESPN bit in which the cast found themselves in Jumanji with the need to call Oakland Raiders NFL player Marshawn Lynch for help. Fans of the movie are also able to to relive it with an amazing escape room experience from new amusement chain 60out Escape Rooms.

Out of the gate, Sony sold the movie as adult as possible and made the promos more broad as they got closer to the release date, a multi-prong campaign for which Rothman gives props to Sony president of worldwide marketing and distribution Josh Greenstein and his team. In addition, Rothman gives shout-outs to domestic distribution head Adrian Smith, international distribution head Steven ODell, Columbia Pictures president Sanford Panitch, and Columbia EVP for productions Ange Giannetti. “This is a really good example of a big wide team effort,” says Rothman. “Everyone pulled together.”

Sony TriStar

Finance sources have informed us that 2017 was one of Sonys most profitable slates in decades, with not only Jumanji but also Baby Driver (which made more than $50M in black ink), The Emoji Movie and Marvels Spider-Man: Homecoming ($200.1M in estimated profit).

Yet in the industrys headlong pursuit of known titles that can succeed at the box office, they often forget you cant have sequels without first installments. Rothman learned that at Fox when he rolled the dice on Avatar, which is yielding four more movies. With the success of Jumanji, it further underscores his mission to make Sony one of the rare studios with a flair for original blockbusters.

Original Article

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Films

‘Antebellum’ has a ‘Get Out’ vibe, but doesn’t live up to its twist

“Antebellum” is built around a provocative twist, and it’s a good one — as well as one that definite..

“Antebellum” is built around a provocative twist, and it’s a good one — as well as one that definitely shouldn’t be spoiled even a little. Once that revelation is absorbed, however, the movie becomes less distinctive and inspired, reflecting an attempt to tap into the zeitgeist that made “Get Out” a breakthrough, without the same ability to pay off the premise.


Originally destined for a theatrical run, the movie hits digital platforms trumpeting a “Get Out” pedigree in its marketing campaign, since there’s an overlap among the producing teams.


More directly, the film marks the directing debut of Gerard Bush + Christopher Renz, who have championed social-justice issues through their advertising work. The opening script features a quote from author William Faulkner, whose intent will eventually become clearer: “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”


If that sounds like a timely means of drawing a line from the horrors of slavery to the racism of today, you’ve come to the right place.

The story begins on a plantation, where the brutal overseers carry out grisly punishments against those tilling the fields. A few have just tried to escape, led by Veronica (Janelle Monae), and they pay a heavy price for their resistance, which does nothing to curb her defiance.

Also written by Bush + Renz, the script take too long before revealing what makes “Antebellum” different, but the middle portion — a “The Twilight Zone”-like phase when it’s hard to be sure exactly what’s going on — is actually the film’s strongest. (Even the trailer arguably gives away too much, so the less one knows, the better.)



The final stretch, by contrast, veers into more familiar thriller territory, and feels especially rushed toward the end, leaving behind a host of nagging, unanswered questions. That provides food for thought, but it’s also what separates the movie from something like “Get Out,” which deftly fleshed out its horror underpinnings.


Although the filmmakers (in a taped message) expressed disappointment that the movie wasn’t making its debut in theaters, in a strange way, the on-demand format somewhat works in its favor. In the press notes, Bush says the goal was “to force the audience to look at the real-life horror of racism through the lens of film horror. We’re landing in the middle of the very conversations that we hoped ‘Antebellum’ would spur.”


“Antebellum” should add to that discussion, so mission accomplished on that level. Monae is also quite good in her first leading film role (she did previously star in the series “Homecoming’s” second season), but otherwise, most of the characters remain underdeveloped.

In a theater, the tendency with a movie so dependent on a central mystery might be to become antsy. At home, “Antebellum” is worth seeing, not only because of what it has to say about America’s past and present, but as a reminder of the often yawning gap between an intriguing idea and a fully realized film.



Read from source: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/17/entertainment/antebellum-review/index.html

Share this:

Continue Reading

Films

‘Chemical Hearts’ director Richard Tanne on the film’s ‘bittersweet’ ending and what he hopes fans take away from the movie

“Chemical Hearts” director Richard Tanne spoke to Insider about the film’s “bittersweet” ending and ..

“Chemical Hearts” director Richard Tanne spoke to Insider about the film’s “bittersweet” ending and what he hopes fans take away from it.

“I think it’s gonna disappoint some people, and maybe all people on a certain level, ” the 35-year-old filmmaker told us. “It’s bittersweet. But that’s OK.”

The film, based on Krystal Sutherland’s 2016 book “Our Chemical Hearts” and now available to stream on Amazon Prime Video, centers on 17-year-old high school senior Henry Page (Austin Abrams), who finds himself drawn to a mysterious and secretive new transfer student named Grace Town (Lili Reinhart).

“Chemical Hearts” is told from Henry’s perspective, chronicling his first heartbreak after he falls in love with the person he thinks Grace is.

Tanne, who wrote the screenplay, said that he was impressed by how the story goes ‘a little bit deeper than your average teen romance’


“I loved how it embraced the dark side of being young, the pain and the grief and the loss, the idea of crossing the threshold from being an adolescent to an adult for the first time,” he told us.

By the end of the movie, Henry learns about Grace’s tragic past. On their last day of senior year, the characters don’t end up together. Instead, they prepare to explore different futures, with Henry heading off to a school for writing and Grace taking a year off to continue therapy.

Even though fans might be disappointed by the love interests splitting, Tanne said that ‘not everything has to be escapist’


“Sometimes, younger people watching movies don’t know that it’s OK to have unhappy endings because they’re fed a steady stream, a steady diet of escapist happily ever after movies,” he told us. “And that’s OK.”

He added: “There’s a place for those, I’m not knocking them. But I just wanted to make something that didn’t talk down to the younger audience. I wanted to make something that either meets them at their level or asks them to reach a little bit higher or dig a little bit deeper.”

Tanne said that having to confront that ‘bittersweet ending’ could also be useful to viewers


The director described the conclusion as bittersweet because “there’s hope at the end, maybe not for their relationship, but for other aspects of their lives.”

“Maybe it will be helpful for young people to see that and walk away with the same sting that Henry has, but to know that it’s going to be OK, to know that Henry will be OK,” he said.

Abrams, who was 22 when he filmed the movie, told Insider that hopefully, audiences will empathize with Henry.

“I think in terms of I supposed how he’s navigating relationships, I feel like hopefully at least anyone can relate to that,” he said.

Abrams told Insider that Henry and Grace’s relationship status at the end speaks to the film’s realistic nature


Abrams shared similar sentiments as Tanne, telling us that they tried to “portray the characters as honestly as possible,” which ties in to the conclusion.

“I think there are some people that meet one person and that’s who they’re with for the rest of their lives, who actually are Henry’s parents in the movie,” the 23-year-old actor told us.

“But then there are other people, and I think it’s probably a larger number, that are going to be in multiple relationships and some of them, a lot of them aren’t going to go well. I hope that that’s an aspect of the movie that people are able to relate to.”

Abrams added that he’s “perfectly fine” letting fans decide for themselves what their main takeaways are from “Chemical Hearts.”

“I hope that maybe they take away things that I didn’t even think of, because everyone’s different and at a different point in their life and hopefully will be able to relate to it in different ways.”

Read from source: https://www.insider.com/chemical-hearts-director-richard-tanne-bittersweet-ending-interview-2020-8


Continue Reading

Films

Julia Sawalha furious after being told she is ‘too old’

Julia Sawalha has said she has been “plucked, stuffed and roasted” after being told that she would n..

Julia Sawalha has said she has been “plucked, stuffed and roasted” after being told that she would not be cast in the forthcoming sequel to the hit Aardman Animation film Chicken Run as her voice sounded “too old”.

In the original film, released in 2000, Sawalha voiced the lead role of Ginger, the plucky hen who inspires her fellow egg-layers to escape from a farm when they are threatened with being turned into pies. News of the development of a sequel first emerged in 2018, and Netflixs involvement was announced in June. It is due to be directed by Sam Fell (ParaNorman) and start production in 2021.

Sawalha posted a statement on social media saying she was told a week ago that she was not wanted for the sequel. “The reason they gave is that my voice now sounds too old and they want a younger actress to reprise the role.”

She added: “Usually in these circumstances, an actress would be given the chance to do a voice test in order to determine the suitability of their pitch and tone, I however was not given this opportunity. I am passionate about my work and I dont go down without a fight, so I did my own voice test at home and sent it to the producers … However, they stated, We will be going ahead to recast the voice of Ginger.”

Sawalhas protest follows reports that Mel Gibson, who voiced the character of daredevil rooster Rocky, would not be involved in the sequel. While Rocky is named as a character in the official plot synopsis for Chicken Run 2, the role is due to be recast. Variety magazine reported that Gibson was told that as “the sequel will revolve around younger chickens, therefore casting younger voice actors” was necessary. The report also claimed that Gibsons history of controversial behaviour, including an accusation of antisemitic comments by actor Winona Ryder, which Gibson denies, played no part in the recasting.

Sawalha added: “I feel I have been fobbed off with the same excuse … To say I am devastated and furious would be an understatement. I feel totally powerless.”

No official announcements have been made for the Chicken Run 2 cast, but original film cast members Jane Horrocks and Lynn Ferguson have been added to the films IMDb page.

Aardman has been contacted for a response.

READ MORE FROM SOURCE

Continue Reading

Trending